<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>RobKelley RobKelley! - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-611083c9" type="application/json"/><link>http://robkelley.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://robkelley.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:01:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Shortlinks for Haiti donation system: Good Idea? Bad Idea?</title><link>http://robkelley.net/blog/2010/01/30/shortlinks-for-haiti-donation-system-good-idea-bad-idea/#comment-32329246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pros - it's giving money to people who needs it! What's not to love?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cons - I would imagine URL shortening is tough from a technology standpoint, as it has to scale. You'd have to get twitter or the many clients on board with auto-converting URLs to this new service, or hope that people remember to do it themselves. Plus with the public being a little bit better educated now on how charities work, thanks to the Wyclef debacle, you'd have to wonder if people would rather give their money to a new charity instead of just directly donating to the Red Cross or Salvation Army.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bpapa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
